AI in Peer Review

View at publisher
Authors: Esteban Zavaleta‐Monestel, José Miguel Chaverri-Fernández, Sebastián Arguedas-Chacón
Cited by: 1
References: 5

Abstract

The text discusses the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the peer review process in scientific publishing. It argues that improving review quality should take precedence over increasing efficiency by emphasizing reviewer training, encouraging authors to critically assess their manuscripts before submission, and ensuring rigorous evaluation of AI systems. The authors also highlight potential risks associated with AI, including cognitive overreliance, bias, inaccurate outputs, and unequal access to technological resources. Finally, they advocate for the transparent, validated, and equitable implementation of AI to strengthen the fairness, rigor, objectivity, and integrity of peer review rather than focusing solely on faster editorial processes.

Fields of Study & Subjects

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Academic Publishing and Open Access

Publication details

Journal / source
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Volume
335
Issue
6
Pages
549–549
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN