Threshold and Predictive Alerts of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetes

Read full text
Authors: Yaxin Wang, Li Cao, Jingyi Lu, Jingyi Guo, Jiaying Ni, Yuan Yao, Zhouli Shen, Wei Zhu, Ronghui Du, Jian Zhou
Cited by: 1
References: 32

Abstract

Importance: Interest in use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital is increasing, yet clear guidance on the optimal implementation of CGM glucose alerts is lacking. It also remains unclear if alerts themselves or the fact that sensor values are available in real time are the main reason for improved glucose outcomes observed with inpatient CGM use. Objective: To determine the incremental value of CGM threshold and predictive alerts for glucose management among hospitalized adults with diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted between April 15 and December 9, 2024, at a tertiary hospital. Eligible participants were adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes admitted to endocrinology wards. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 1 of the 3 CGM alert strategies: all alerts off (n = 178), threshold alerts only (n = 177), or threshold plus predictive alerts (n = 178). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of time within the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL (time in range [TIR]). The primary analysis was conducted on a modified intention-to-treat basis, including all randomized participants except those who were subsequently confirmed not to meet the eligibility criteria. Results: Among the 533 randomized participants, 331 (62.1%) were male, the mean (SD) age was 62 (12) years, and the mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c level was 9.2% (2.1%). The mean (SD) TIR during hospitalization was significantly higher among the group with threshold alerts on than the group with all alerts off (75.1% [16.6%] vs 71.2% [18.1%]; adjusted mean difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.1%-7.8%]; Holm-adjusted P = .04). Moreover, time above range (>180 mg/dL) was lower in the group with threshold alerts on than in the group with all alerts off (-3.9% [95% CI, -7.1% to -0.7%]), whereas time below range (

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients Diabetes Management and Research Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Publication details

Journal / source
JAMA Network Open
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
e2629291–e2629291
Publication date
20 August 2026
Language
EN