The Anxious Cycle

View at publisher
Authors: Stephen Neely, Kevin B. Smith, Savannah Havird, Megan Corn
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Chapter 12 concludes The Anxious State by reframing political stress and polarization as mutually reinforcing forces in a self-perpetuating “anxious cycle.” Using regression analysis, the authors demonstrate that higher levels of partisan hostility predict elevated political stress, suggesting that affective polarization and anxiety reinforce one another in a feedback loop. This interdependence, they argue, makes the anxious state a “wicked problem,” complex, evolving, and resistant to quick fixes. The chapter then turns to practical steps individuals can take to protect their well-being within this environment: reducing daily media exposure, engaging in deliberate “digital detoxes,” and reexamining the weight of partisan identity in shaping personal meaning and social relationships. Drawing on interdisciplinary evidence, the authors conclude that while structural reform may be elusive, individual mindfulness and intentional disengagement from toxic political and media cycles can mitigate the psychological toll of 21st-century civic life.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Electoral Systems and Political Participation Social Media and Politics COVID-19 and Mental Health

Publication details

Pages
181–190
Publication date
10 January 2026
Language
EN