Soil background effects on UAS and proximal remote sensing‐derived vegetation indices

Read full text
Authors: Rahul Raman, Haly Neely, Nithya Rajan, Jeffrey Siegfried, Amir M. H. Ibrahim, Curtis B. Adams, Robert G. Hardin
Cited by: 4
References: 27

Abstract

Abstract Exposed soil, due to low vegetation cover or in open canopy crops, influences scene reflectance derived from remotely sensed data. An experiment was conducted in College Station, TX, to investigate the potential of six unmanned aerial systems (UASs)‐derived and proximally sensed vegetation indices (VIs) in suppressing soil background brightness of four treatments in 2020 and 2021. The treatments were dry soil, dry soil with winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) crop residue, wet soil (WS), and wet soil with winter wheat crop residue (CRWS) in 2020. In 2021, WS and CRWS were replaced with dry sand and dry compost (DC). The VIs were calculated from remotely sensed data of treatment plots. Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy cover (%) on different dates of UAS flight was extracted using unsupervised classification. Factors such as shadows, crop residue, soil moisture, and uneven canopy growth influenced the scene reflectance. The shadow on the soil decreased the soil background reflectance to 30% in 2020. Similarly, higher NDVI was observed for DC treatment plots at an estimated mean canopy cover of

Fields of Study & Subjects

Remote Sensing in Agriculture Soil Geostatistics and Mapping Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology

Publication details

Journal / source
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
118
Issue
1
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN