Assessing Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Patient‐Reported Disability Measure and Self‐Administered Neuroperformance Outcomes

Read full text
Authors: Evy M. Reinders, Ariadna Masot-Llima, Susana Otero‐Romero, René Carvajal, Álvaro Cobo‐Calvo, Pere Carbonell‐Mirabent, Jordina Beltran, María Jesús Arévalo, Helena Ariño, Georgina Arrambide, Cristina Auger, Luca Bollo
+29 more Joaquín Castilló, Manuel Comabella, Ingrid Galán, Alexis García-Sarreón, Andrew Goodman, Carrie M. Hersh, Delon La Puma, Le H. Hua, Luciana Midaglia, Neus Mongay‐Ochoa, Ellen M. Mowry, Agustín Pappolla, Breogán Rodríguez-Acevedo, Jordi Río, Paula Tagliani, Ángela Vidal‐Jordana, Andreu Vilaseca, Ana Zabalza, Deborah Pareto, Carlos Nos, Menno Michiel Schoonheim, Eva M. M. Strijbis, Jaume Sastre‐Garriga, Madalina Tivarus, Tjalf Ziemssen, Àlex Rovira, Xavier Montalban, Mar Tintoré, Carmen Tur
Cited by: 1
References: 43

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of patient-reported/administered outcomes to capture disability worsening and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We included patients from the longitudinal multicenter MS PATHS cohort with ≥3 assessments and >6 months follow-up. PIRA was defined on the patient-determined disease steps (PDDS) and self-administered tests assessing walking speed, manual dexterity, and processing speed, in the absence of self-reported relapses. We assessed (i) prevalence of PDDS/self-administered test-based disability worsening and PIRA definitions; (ii) their concurrent validity, through the association with worsening and PIRA definitions based on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS; Barcelona subcohort); and (iii) their clinical meaningfulness, through the correlation with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quality-of-life (QoL) data trajectories. RESULTS: We included 9,088 patients (73% female patients; age = 46.8 years; disease duration = 14.2 years). Over a 3-year follow-up, 4,066 (45%) patients worsened on ≥1 patient-reported/administered outcome, of which 2,357 (58%) developed PIRA. In the Barcelona subcohort (N = 279), 68 (24%) patients developed EDSS-based worsening, of which 30 (44%) developed EDSS-based PIRA; 99 of 279 (35%) worsened on ≥1 patient-reported/administered test, of which 78 of 99 (79%) had PIRA. Worsening (but not PIRA) on PDDS was associated with EDSS-based worsening (odds ratio = 3.03 [1.42; 6.43], p = 0.004). PDDS/self-administered-test-based worsening or PIRA strongly correlated with accelerated brain atrophy and T2 lesion volume increase compared to non-worseners (p < 0.05), and showed worse QoL (p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Despite only partial agreement with EDSS-based definitions, PDDS/self-administered test-based worsening and PIRA definitions were clinically meaningful, by identifying patients with greater brain damage and poorer QoL, supporting their use in clinical practice. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:525-546.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research Balance Gait and Falls Prevention

Publication details

Journal / source
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
525–546
Publication date
6 July 2026
Language
EN