A Co‐production Evaluation Tool Informed by Co‐production Workshops for Use in Evidence Synthesis Contexts

Read full text
Authors: Meena Khatwa, Vanessa Bennett, Rachael C. Edwards, Lisa Richardson, Phuong Tu Nguyen, Sajid Saleem, Sylvia Chaires, Alison O’Mara-Eves, Dylan Kneale
Cited by: 0
References: 23

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to co-produce a tool for evaluating co-production within evidence syntheses. Background: Participatory approaches are recommended to enhance the salience and quality of evidence syntheses, and there is an increasing onus on co-producing evidence synthesis. Co-production is a way of working where research generators, beneficiaries and other interest holders work in equal partnership and for mutual benefit. Methods: To develop our approach, we: Examined selected existing tools and frameworks that could be useful in evaluating co-productionDeveloped an initial tool that was then modified through input from co-production workshopsPiloted the tool and evaluation approach in a project as part of research involving co-producing a logic model to support evidence syntheses. Results: The existing tools guidance and resources we examined were deemed to be oriented towards supporting the conduct and reporting of co-production, rather than evaluating what happens and how. This provided a basis for co-producing a new tool. A new tool was developed that captures our perspectives on: positionality and expertise; motivations and expected benefits; clarity of role and expectations; project involvement and contributions; value and recognition; skills, knowledge, and personal growth; relationships and networking; comfort, support, and accessibility; and decision-making and power sharing. We reflected that the tool and process for administering the tool worked well, and we liked the process of collective sensemaking. Conclusions: We believe that the tool (which we refer to as the STRAPS tool - Synthesising Through Reflection And Participatory Sense-making) could provide a useful resource and starting point to other review teams who wish to evaluate co-production in their reviews and encourage others to share their experiences with us. Implications: Co-production enhances the quality of evidence syntheses. Use of the STRAPS tool can help reviewers unpack the process by which this happens using a standardised approach.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Health Policy Implementation Science Mental Health and Patient Involvement Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Publication details

Journal / source
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e70065–e70065
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN