Freedon study: Real‐life outcomes of cenobamate in different lines of treatment

Read full text
Authors: V Villanueva, José María Serratosa, Alejandro Fernández‐Cabrera, M Toledo, Beatriz González‐Giráldez, José C. Estévez, Juan Jesús Rodríguez Uranga, Maria Machio Castello, M D Castro-Vilanova, Juan José Poza, Xiana Rodríguez‐Osorio, Kevin G. Hampel
+39 more Elena Fonseca, Francisco Javier López‐González, Mercedes Garcés, Laura Abraira, Jordi Ciurans, Daniel Campos, Estevo Santamarina, Juan María Sanchez‐Caro, Lucas Iacampo, J. Renau, Miguel Ángel García‐Quesada, Carla Anciones, María Isabel Chamorro, Iratxe Maestro, Pablo Cabezudo, Raquel Calle, Jesús Macarrón, B. C. Cabezas, María Carrasco, María López, M. Marín-Gracia, Rosa Querol, Belén Baena, Vanessa García‐Morales, Samuel López‐Maza, Álvaro Juiz, Blanca Mercedes‐Alvarez, Carla Amarante, Ana del Villar, Ascensión Castillo, Marta Rubio‐Roy, Javier Martínez‐Poles, Asier Gómez‐Ibáñez, Beatriz Parejo‐Carbonell, Anabelén Martínez Garcia, Ignacio Carrera, Pablo Iriarte, Fátima Romero‐Aguilera, the Pharmacological Therapy Working group of the Spanish Epilepsy Society and Freedon Group
Cited by: 3
References: 40

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) with proven effectiveness in individuals with highly refractory epilepsy. This study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of cenobamate in different treatment lines and a less refractory setting. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Adults with focal epilepsy, 2-6 prior ASMs, and ≥12 months between cenobamate initiation and database closure were included. Data from patients' charts were collected and included in the Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Registry of the Spanish Epilepsy Society using Research Electronic Data Capture. Primary effectiveness endpoints included changes in seizure frequency at 3, 6, and 12 months after cenobamate initiation according to different treatment lines. Primary safety endpoints included the percentage of patients with adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: In total, 486 patients were included (mean age 42.8 years). The mean number of prior ASMs was 4.4 (2-6); the mean number of concomitant ASMs at cenobamate initiation was 2.5 (1-5). At 12 months, treatment retention was 92% and median dose was 200 mg. One-year seizure-freedom rates were 32.5%, 33.3%, 21.4%, 24.2%, and 11.4% in those treated with 2-6 prior ASMs, respectively. The proportions of patients achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% reductions in seizure frequency at 12 months were significantly higher in patients with 2-3 (earlier treatment lines) vs 4-6 prior ASMs (later treatment lines; p ≤ .004). Improvements in seizure severity were reported in 71.9% of patients during follow-up (82.5% and 62.1% in those with 2 and 6 prior ASMs, respectively). At 12 months, 56.4% of patients had reported AEs, with somnolence the most frequent, and 4.9% had AEs requiring cenobamate discontinuation. SIGNIFICANCE: Cenobamate was effective and well tolerated in patients who had tried 2-6 prior ASMs in a real-world setting. High effectiveness was confirmed at 1 year, with better outcomes in earlier users.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Epilepsy research and treatment Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
2177–2189
Publication date
28 January 2026
Language
EN