Disease Site‐Specific Outcomes in p 16‐Positive Non‐Oropharyngeal Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer

Read full text
Authors: Revadhi C. Chelvarajah, Lessandra Y. S. Chee, Jie Su, Brian O’Sullivan, Christopher M. K. L. Yao, Enrique Sanz‐García, Stephen M. Smith, Ilan Weinreb, Scott Victor Bratman, B. C. John Cho, Ezra Hahn, Andrew Hope
+10 more Ali Hosni, John Kim, Andrew J. McPartlin, Nauman Malik, Chiaojung Jillian Tsai, John R. de Almeida, Anna Spreafico, Li Tong, Shao Hui Huang, John N Waldron
Cited by: 0
References: 47

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report disease-free survival (DFS) in p16-positive non-oropharyngeal head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Curatively-treated non-oropharyngeal HNSCC (2009-2021) were reviewed. DFS was compared among p16-positive, p16-negative, and p16-untested cases for the overall cohort and by disease site. Multivariable analysis estimated adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for p16-positivity. RESULTS: Among 3061 non-oropharyngeal HNSCC, 91 p16+, 375 p16-, 2595 untested; median follow-up 4.7 years. P16-positive patients had superior 5-year DFS versus p16-/untested (74% vs. 48%/59%; aHR 0.40 [0.26-0.61], p < 0.001). This advantage was evident in the larynx (86% vs. 52%/63%; aHR 0.26 [0.09-0.71], p = 0.005), hypopharynx (70% vs. 25%/37%; aHR 0.55 [0.10-0.50], p < 0.001), and nasal cavity (82% vs. 38%/66%; aHR 0.31 [0.11-0.88], p = 0.028). No significant DFS differences were seen in paranasal sinus (40% vs. 64%/41%; p = 0.39) or oral cavity (50% vs. 57%/58%; p = 0.94). CONCLUSION: p16-positivity confers a DFS benefit in larynx/hypopharynx/nasal cavity, but not in paranasal sinus or oral SCC.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Head and Neck Cancer Studies Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Head & Neck
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
2156–2169
Publication date
12 March 2026
Language
EN