Molecular–clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in 163 metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas with a comparison to colorectal adenocarcinomas

Read full text
Authors: Siren Morken, Seppo W. Langer, Geir Olav Hjortland, Anna Sundlöv, Eva Hofsli, Morten Ladekarl, Elizaveta Mitkina Tabaksblat, Lene Weber Vestermark, J. Svensson, Ulrich Knigge, Luís Nunes, Bengt Glimelius
+9 more Per Pfeiffer, Kristine Aasebø, Jörg Aßmus, Erik Vassella, Inger Marie Bowitz Lothe, Anne Couvelard, Aurel Perren, Stian Knappskog, Halfdan Sørbye
Cited by: 4
References: 28

Abstract

There is limited data regarding the rare and aggressive colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (CR-NEC). In this large prospective study, molecular-clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes following palliative chemotherapy are reported for 163 metastatic CR-NEC patients, with a comparison to a population-based prospective cohort of 263 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CR-AC) patients. Eighty-three percent of CR-NEC received first-line platinum-etoposide, while 98% of CR-AC patients received first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Disease control rate across all first-line regimens in CR-NEC and CR-AC was 43% vs. 74%, immediate progressive disease 46% vs. 15%, progression-free survival 2.4 months (m) (95% CI 2.1-3.3) vs. 7.7 m (95% CI 6.9-8.5), and overall survival 6.7 m (95% CI 5.6-8.8) vs. 16.8 m (95% CI 13.7-20.3), all, p < .001. CR-NEC more often had synchronous metastases, worse performance status, and symptom burden at treatment initiation than CR-AC (all, p < .001). Two-year survival was 9% vs. 37% in CR-NEC and CR-AC (p < .001). BRAF mutations were frequent in CR-NEC and CR-AC (26% vs. 20%, p = .153) and associated with shorter OS in CR-NEC and CR-AC (p = .025 and p = .003). KRAS mutations were less frequent in CR-NEC than CR-AC (34% vs. 45%, p = .041), but only associated with shorter OS in rectal NEC (p = .04). The frequencies of APC and TP53 mutations were similar between the cohorts and did not impact survival. Metastatic CR-NEC and CR-AC are clinically distinct, with NEC demonstrating more aggressive features, limited treatment effect, and worse prognosis. Although they share important driver mutations, the underlying reason for their marked clinical differences remains unclear.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances Lung Cancer Research Studies Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
158
Issue
12
Pages
3217–3231
Publication date
5 February 2026
Language
EN