A comparison in maternal and neonatal outcomes between mild fundal pressure and vacuum extraction for shortening the second stage of labor

Read full text
Authors: Omri Dominsky, Nurit Malka Goldwasser, Roza Berkovits‐Shperling, Michal Rosenberg-Friedman, Yoav Baruch, Yariv Yogev, Anat Lavie
Cited by: 1
References: 22

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mild fundal pressure (MFP) and vacuum extraction (VE) are interventions used during the second stage of labor when clinical intervention is required. While VE is well established with standardized training and predictable risks, MFP remains controversial with limited comparative data. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of MFP versus VE in women requiring intervention during the second stage of labor. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton term pregnancies requiring intervention during the second stage of labor at a tertiary medical center (January 2022-June 2025). Both interventions were appropriate for the same indications; the choice was at physician discretion. The primary outcome was a composite maternal outcome comprising obstetric anal sphincter injury or postpartum hemorrhage. The secondary outcome was a composite neonatal outcome including Apgar score

Fields of Study & Subjects

Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions Pelvic floor disorders treatments Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
175
Issue
1
Pages
382-387
Publication date
27 April 2026
Language
EN