Evaluating the Impact of Enfortumab Vedotin Dose Modifications on Clinical Efficacy Using Tumor Growth Inhibition Modeling in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer

Read full text
Authors: Vaishali L. Chudasama, Gabriela Patilea‐Vrana, Hong Mu, Salaheldin Hamed, Srinivasu Poondru, Amit Garg, Yen Lin Chia
Cited by: 1
References: 21

Abstract

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved for previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), based on results from pivotal trials (phase 2, EV-201; phase 3, EV-301) evaluating EV monotherapy at 1.25 mg/kg 3Q4W (Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). Adverse events (AEs) were managed by protocol-recommended dose modifications, with 35.5%-51.7% patients requiring dose reductions and most patients in EV-301 maintaining the 1.25 mg/kg dose through Cycle 7. Dose modifications appeared to have a limited impact on long-term efficacy in patients who achieved a response. Given that target lesion shrinkage is predictive of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with mUC in EV-301, we aimed to quantify the impact of EV starting dose and dose modifications on response onset and durability, hence the impact on PFS and OS, by characterizing tumor dynamics via a tumor growth inhibition (TGI) model. A population pharmacokinetic-TGI model was developed using data from 603 patients with mUC who received EV monotherapy at 0.5-1.25 mg/kg 3Q4W. Various dosing simulations indicated that a 1.25 mg/kg starting dose maximized the likelihood of response, and dose modifications at or after Cycle 3 had limited impact on simulated response duration. However, unwarranted treatment modifications in earlier treatment cycles (

Fields of Study & Subjects

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments Renal cell carcinoma treatment Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
e70241–e70241
Publication date
1 July 2026
Language
EN