Distal femoral varus deformity becomes a cause of undercorrection in open wedge high tibial osteotomy

Read full text
Authors: Akira Maeyama, Tetsuro Ishimatsu, Taiki Matsunaga, Kotaro Miyazaki, Yoshiaki Hideshima, Takuaki Yamamoto
Cited by: 1
References: 26

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether a high lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) contributes to undercorrection of lower-limb alignment following medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), and to determine the LDFA threshold above which tibial correction alone may be insufficient. Methods: This retrospective study analysed 68 patients who underwent MOWHTO at our hospital between 2020 and 2022. Based on their postoperative mechanical axis (MA), patients were categorised into two groups: the acceptable correction group (A-group; MA 57%-67%) and the undercorrection group (U-group; MA ≤ 56%). Radiographic parameters before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. Simple and multiple regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting postoperative MA. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilised to identify the LDFA cut-off value associated with undercorrection. Results: = 0.010) were independent predictors of postoperative MA in multiple regression analysis. The ROC analysis identified an LDFA cut-off of 89.2° for predicting undercorrection (area under the curve = 0.78; sensitivity, 36.8%; specificity, 88.6%). Patients with an LDFA ≥ 89.2° had significantly higher body mass index, joint line convergence angle, varus stress angle, percentage condylar tibial translation and preoperative knee joint line obliquity. Conclusions: A high LDFA (≥89.2°) is associated with an increased risk of undercorrection after MOWHTO, despite accurate tibial correction. These findings suggest that in cases with significant distal femoral varus, isolated tibial osteotomy may be insufficient. Double-level osteotomy, including femoral correction, should be considered in such cases to achieve optimal alignment. Level of Evidence: Level Ⅳ, retrospective comparative study.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e70621–e70621
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN