Reduced workload demand with handheld robotic‐assisted revision knee arthroplasty: A multi‐centre NASA Task Load Index analysis

Read full text
Authors: Andrew Porteous, James Murray, Max Ettinger, Peter Savov, Matteo Innocenti, Gijs van Hellemondt, Koen C. Defoort, Juan Carlos Martinez‐Pastor, Peter Bollars, Francesco Zambianchi, Alberto Belluati, Catherine Whittall
Cited by: 1
References: 33

Abstract

Purpose: Revision total knee arthroplasty is a complex and technically demanding procedure, with an increasing global incidence. This complexity heightens the cognitive and physical demands of surgical teams, contributing to elevated burnout, musculoskeletal injuries and psychological stress. This European wide multi-centre observational evaluation assessed the impact of a handheld robotic-assisted surgical system on intra-operative workload using the NASA Task Load Index instrument to compare robotic-assisted and manual instrumentation approaches during revision knee arthroplasty. Methods: Data were collected from 212 surveys following 100 revision knee arthroplasty procedures, capturing subjective workload measures across six NASA Task Load Index domains from surgeons and peri-operative theatre staff. Results: = 0.0003). Domain-specific analyses revealed significantly lower mental demand, physical demand and effort in the robotic-assisted group without compromising perceived surgical performance, temporal demand, or frustration. A subgroup analysis of the lead surgeons showed consistent perceived workload reductions consistent with the overall findings. These results suggest that the handheld robotic-assisted surgical system may mitigate cognitive and physical strain during complex revision knee arthroplasty procedures. Conclusions: This evaluation underscores the potential of robotic-assisted technology to enhance surgical ergonomics, reduce surgeon fatigue and improve well-being, which may translate into sustained surgical performance. Future work should incorporate objective ergonomic measures, expand participant roles and explore long-term impacts on clinical outcomes and staff welfare. Level of Evidence: Level II.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e70737–e70737
Publication date
1 April 2026
Language
EN