ACL rehabilitation after reconstruction: Evidence‐based consensus recommendations from the German Knee Society—Part IV

Read full text
Authors: Martin Häner, Wolf Petersen, Arthur Praetorius, Natalie Mengis, Thomas Stoffels, Daniel Guenther, Thomas Pfeiffer, Julian Mehl, Andree Ellermann, Christian Eberle, Thomas Stein, Christian Schoepp
+23 more Jürgen Höher, Sven Scheffler, Amelie Stöhr, Mirko Herbort, Tobias Jung, Christoph Kittl, Philipp-Johannes Braun, Katrin Karpinski, Andrea Achtnich, Raymond Best, Ben Wagener, Jochen Bellerich, Lena Eggeling, Tobias Gensior, Christina Valle, Janina Tennler, Sebastian Stemmler, Matthias Jäger, Lars-Christopher Färber, Clemens Baier, Alexandra Schöllkopf, Max Wießmeier, Daniel Niederer
Cited by: 1
References: 73

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this consensus was to provide evidence-based recommendations for individual rehabilitation interventions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. These recommendations are intended to complement, rather than replace, comprehensive criterion-based rehabilitation protocols. Methods: A modified Delphi process conducted by the German Knee Society evaluated 29 rehabilitation topics. Evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies (A1-C) was summarized and rated by an expert panel. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement between raters. Statements were graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, specifying the certainty of evidence. Results: Consensus was achieved for 25 topics (86%). Moderate-certainty evidence (B2) indicates that early weight bearing likely results in safe functional recovery. Supervised and unsupervised exercise (A2-B2) likely results in improved strength and function. Rehabilitation lasting ≥9 months (A1) likely results in optimal recovery guided by functional progress. Neuromuscular training (A1) and proprioceptive training (B2) likely improve sensorimotor control and functional outcomes. Plyometric (B2) and eccentric exercises (B2), as well as blood flow restriction (A1), likely result in enhanced quadriceps strength and muscle mass. Core stability exercises (C) and aquatic therapy (B1) likely improve knee function and facilitate early return to activity. Adjunctive modalities, such as cryotherapy (A2), likely reduce pain and swelling; KT (C) and digital applications (B1) may improve early-phase outcomes. Interventions such as whole-body vibration training (B2) and cross-education (C) showed inconsistent or insufficient benefits. Rehabilitation should be individualized according to patient-specific factors, concomitant injuries and functional progress. Conclusion: These consensus recommendations provide a multimodal, evidence-based framework for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Following these recommendations likely reduces variability in clinical practice, supports safe return to sport and might lower the risk of re-injury. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert consensus.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
e70875–e70875
Publication date
1 July 2026
Language
EN