Efficacy of a Novel Ablation Index Algorithm for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation Using a Flexible‐Tip Ablation Catheter

Read full text
Authors: Koji Sudo, Kenji Kuroki, Tetsuya Asakawa, Kazuya Nakagawa, Jumpei Saito, Chisa Asahina, Takeaki Goto, Maoko Atsumi, Tomoaki Hasegawa, Yasuteru Yamauchi, Kazutaka Aonuma, Akira Sato
Cited by: 1
References: 23

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction AutoMark Index (AI) is a novel ablation algorithm integrating contact force (CF), radiofrequency (RF) current, and application duration to provide real‐time lesion formation feedback. Data of AI using a flexible‐tip RF ablation catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation remain limited. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AI‐guided CTI ablation. Methods Consecutive 148 patients undergoing CTI ablation with a CF‐sensing flexible‐tip ablation catheter were included. Outcomes using an AI‐guided protocol (50 W, targeting AI of 50; AI‐50 group, 62 patients) were compared with a conventional protocol (40 W for 20 s; 40‐W group, 86 patients). Results The first‐line success rate showed no difference between the two groups (40‐W group: 72/86 [84.7%] vs. AI‐50 group: 51/62 [82.2%], p = 0.81). The total RF application showed no difference (40‐W group: 12 [9.5–15] vs. AI‐50 group: 12 [9.7–16], p = 0.50); however, significant differences were observed in the total RF duration (40‐W group: 274 [211–372] s vs. AI‐50 group: 180 [138–249] s, p < 0.001), the RF duration for initial block (40‐W group: 225 [163–323] s vs. AI‐50 group: 149 [109–221] s, p < 0.001), and CTI procedural time (40‐W group: 9.2 [6.0–14.6] min vs. AI‐50 group: 6.3 [4.5–9.7] min, p = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in the mean CF, average temperature, and CTI length between the two groups. No major complications were observed in either of the groups. Conclusion AI‐guided CTI ablation protocol is efficient in shortening RF duration for acute bidirectional CTI block and CTI procedure time compared to the conventional 40 W ablation protocol.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Arrhythmia
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
e70378–e70378
Publication date
27 May 2026
Language
EN