Age‐ and time‐specific management of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: The 2024 ESSKA‐ESA formal consensus. Part 1: History taking, physical exam and imaging studies

PURPOSE: To provide an ESSKA-ESA formal Consensus to help general practitioners in their daily clinical decisions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability (TASI) according to age and timing after injury. Part 1 is dedicated to the history-taking, physical examination and imaging studies. METHODS: Patients were categorised into three age groups: adolescents (40 years). Two clinical scenarios were addressed: first-time and recurrent dislocations. A formal consensus process was followed, including a steering group (15 experts from 9 countries), a rating group (18 experts from 18 countries) and a reader group (28 experts from 13 countries). The steering group formulated 35 clinical questions, 12 of which related to Part 1. Each question was answered with a statement and grade of recommendation (A-D), based on literature and expert opinion. The rating group reviewed and refined the statements, followed by validation from the reader group for cultural adaptability. RESULTS: Consensus was reached with high agreement: median (range) 9 (8-9). One question received a grade A recommendation, nine were B, and two were C. Most debated topics included imaging to guide treatment decisions in first-time dislocations, assessment of glenoid bone loss, and soft tissue quality. Each age group presents unique diagnostic considerations: younger patients have higher recurrence risk and activity levels; older patients more often present with associated soft-tissue injuries. While physical exam findings were consistent across ages, associated injuries gain importance with age. The distinction between first-time and recurrent dislocations significantly impacts imaging needs. CONCLUSIONS: The ESSKA-ESA Consensus highlights that age and timing (first-time versus recurrent) influence the decision-making when managing TASI. All parameters related to history taking, physical exam and imaging studies should be considered according to the patient's age and the number of dislocation episodes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.