European orthopaedic and traumatology residency is predominantly integrated, with substantial variability in competency‐based models and duty hours: A survey of 33 countries

View at publisher
Authors: Marko Ostojić, Jonathan Lettner, Hassan Tarek Hakam, Tin Karakaš, Fabijan Cukelj, Michele Mercurio, Panayotis Megaloikonomos, Ana Čizmić, Rami Madanat, Nikolai Ramadanov, Mikhail Salzmann, Edvin Selmani
+40 more Catharina Chiari, Philippe Van Overschelde, Jasper Lambrechts, Mirza Biščević, Plamen Kinov, Tomislav Smoljanović, Mihovil Plečko, Andreas Tanos, Vojtech Havlas, Bjarke Viberg, Leho Rips, Teija Lund, Zahar Akos, Marco Ezechieli, Theofilos Karachalios, James Harty, Salvatore Risitano, Cen Bytiqi, Roman Seil, Nikola Bulatović, Rob Nelissen, Berte Bøe, Tomasz Piontek, Jorge Mineiro, Razvan Ene, Vladan Stevanović, Blaž Mavčič, Joan Leal Blanquet, Karl Eriksson, Michael T. Hirschmann, Mustafa Karahan, С. И. Бондаренко, Robert Prill, Pier Francesco Indelli, Mislav Jelić, Nanni Allington, Neil Sheth, David Limb, Roland Becker, Pietro Ruggieri
Cited by: 1
References: 38

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe and compare the structure and organization of orthopaedic and traumatology residency training across European countries. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey (31 items) of national teaching experts across Europe (≥10 years of experience in training residents) focused on: specialty integration, training model (time-based/competency-based/hybrid), program duration and duty hours was conducted from October 2023 to February 2025. Standardized extraction by three blinded reviewers was done and the answers were transformed into a consensus dataset. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 33/40 countries (82.5%). In 31/33 countries (94%), orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal traumatology form a unified specialty. Only 9/33 (27%) countries delineate fixed elective-orthopaedics versus trauma blocks during the course of the residency. Training models were predominantly hybrid-having both features of competency and time-based learning criteria (26/33; 78%), with 7/33 (21%) time-based and none fully competency-based. Program length was mostly 5 years (16/33; 48%) or 6 years (11/33; 33%) long. Extremes ranged from 2 to 8 years. Average weekly hours varied from 37 to 70+, with nearly half of countries reporting practice that exceeds the European Working Time Directive 48-h limit via legal exceptions or weak enforcement by hospital. Flexible (less than full time training) pathways exist in 19 (58%) countries (unrestricted in 8; restricted in 11), but remain unavailable in 14 (42%). CONCLUSIONS: European orthopaedic and trauma training programs show great similarity in terms of training duration and being a unified specialty. However, there still is a relevant difference in training models, duty hours and flexibility of prolonged training duration. There is a clear movement toward competency-based training in most of the European countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hospital Admissions and Outcomes Surgical Simulation and Training Innovations in Medical Education

Publication details

Journal / source
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
2291–2301
Publication date
10 May 2026
Language
EN