How do Patient Comorbidities Influence Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes?

Read full text
Authors: Barak M. Spector, Tam Hieu Nguyen, Priya Bandaru, Sandra Simmons, Aaron C. Moberly, Terrin N. Tamati
Cited by: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between weighted comorbidity indices and post-cochlear implant (CI) speech recognition and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary Neurotology Center. METHODS: Adults with bilateral hearing loss who received CIs from 2017 to 2022 were included. Comorbidities were extracted via chart review of anesthesia notes, medication lists, and clinical encounters. Three comorbidity scores were calculated: the Charlson Index (10-year mortality), Elixhauser Index (30-day hospital readmission), and a basic sum index assigning equal weight to 31 conditions. Spearman correlations evaluated bivariate associations. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate independent contributions of each index to CI outcomes, adjusting for clinical covariates. Early (1- or 3-month post-CI) and long-term (6- or 12-month post-CI) outcomes included Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition (CNC) and AzBio sentence recognition in quiet (AzBioQ), and PROMs. RESULTS: = -0.22), while the basic sum index negatively correlated with early CNC and long-term AzBioQ. No indices were associated with PROMs. In multivariable models, only the Elixhauser Index independently predicted early (β = -1.03, P = .005) and long-term (β = -0.65, P = .050) AzBioQ. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the influence of cumulative comorbid disease burden on speech recognition performance and suggests a differential impact of individual comorbidities on CI outcomes.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation Ear Surgery and Otitis Media Hearing Impairment and Communication

Publication details

Journal / source
Otolaryngology
Volume
174
Issue
3
Pages
802–808
Publication date
31 January 2026
Language
EN