From Clusters to Outcomes: Machine Learning‐Based Phenotyping in Intermediate–High‐Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Read full text
Authors: Barkın Kültürsay, Cıhangır Kaymaz, Hacer Ceren Tokgöz, Murat Karaçam, Berhan Keskin, Seda Tanyeri, Aykun Hakgor, Deniz Yakar Mutlu, Çağdaş Buluş, Dicle Sirma, Seyma Zeynep Atici, Metehan Kibar
+8 more Seyma Nur Cicek, Aziz Vezir, Can Erdem, Zubeyde Bayram, Şeyhmus Külahçıoğlu, Ahmet Sekban, İbrahi̇m Hali̇l Tanboğa, Nihal Ozdemir
Cited by: 1
References: 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT Intermediate–high‐risk (IHR) pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a heterogeneous group in whom guideline‐based criteria may insufficiently capture biologic and hemodynamic variability relevant to early deterioration. Data‐driven phenotyping may improve risk stratification and support individualized decisions regarding reperfusion therapy. In this retrospective cohort study (2012–2025), 553 guideline‐defined IHR PE patients were analyzed using unsupervised machine learning. Thirty‐six demographic, clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and CT variables were standardized and encoded as appropriate for clustering. Multiple algorithms were compared, and the optimal model was selected using silhouette width and stability metrics. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, treatment patterns, and outcomes were compared across phenotypes. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality; secondary outcome was all‐cause long‐term mortality. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox models assessed associations with outcomes, and pre–post‐treatment changes were evaluated. Two phenotypes were identified using the k‐prototypes algorithm (silhouette width = 0.697). Cluster 1 (RV‐failure phenotype; n = 360) exhibited younger age, lower systolic blood pressure, more severe RV dysfunction, higher thrombotic burden, and lower baseline TAPSE/PASP ratios. Cluster 2 (comorbidity‐dominant phenotype; n = 193) comprised older patients with more cardiovascular/metabolic comorbidities but relatively preserved hemodynamics. In‐hospital mortality was 6.0% overall and lower in Cluster 2 (3.6% vs. 7.2%); Cluster 2 remained independently associated with reduced early mortality (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19–0.98). The CDT–cluster interaction term was not statistically significant. Both phenotypes demonstrated significant improvements in RV function after reperfusion, with greater gains—including TAPSE/PASP—in Cluster 1. Over a median follow‐up of 73.2 months, long‐term mortality did not differ significantly between phenotypes (log‐rank p = 0.11). Unsupervised ML revealed two clinically meaningful IHR PE phenotypes with divergent early risk but comparable long‐term outcomes. These findings suggest that phenotype‐based assessment may refine risk stratification and help guide individualized decisions regarding CDT and other reperfusion strategies in acute PE.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Publication details

Journal / source
Pulmonary Circulation
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
e70243–e70243
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN