A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes

Read full text
Authors: Joy Z. Nakato, Janice Litunya, Brian Beesiga, Jane Kabami, James Ayieko, Moses Robert Kamya, Gabriel Chamie, Laura B. Balzer
Cited by: 0

Abstract

For many health conditions, there are highly efficacious treatment and prevention products. Maximizing their impact requires strategies that improve the reach of health screening in order to establish who could benefit. For example, HIV prevention strategies aim to expand risk screening and to improve uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among those experiencing risk. Often, these strategies induce changes at the group-level (e.g., health clinics or communities) and are evaluated through cluster randomized trials. This scenario creates a complex, multilevel-mediation-missing data problem for the following reasons: First, the strategy is delivered at the cluster-level, while health screening and outcomes are at the individual-level. Second, the strategy improves health outcomes directly and indirectly through improved health screening. Third, everyone has an "underlying" status, which is only observed among those screened. To formally define the total effect in such settings, we use Counterfactual Strata Effects: causal estimands where the outcome is only relevant for a group whose membership is subject to missingness and/or impacted by the exposure of interest. To identify and estimate the corresponding statistical estimand, we propose a novel extension of Two-Stage targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE). Simulations demonstrate the practical performance of our approach as well as the limitations of existing approaches.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Advanced Causal Inference Techniques Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Publication details

Journal / source
Statistics in Medicine
Volume
45
Issue
15-17
Pages
e70648–e70648
Publication date
26 June 2026
Language
EN