Sleep assessment using accelerometry: Not all algorithms are equal

Read full text
Authors: Ruyan Zhou, Pedro Manuel Marques-Vidal
Cited by: 0
References: 38

Abstract

Abstract Study objectives Accelerometry devices are increasingly used to assess sleep. However, whether different algorithms provide consistent estimates remains uncertain. This study compared sleep parameters derived from two accelerometry‐based algorithms and a self‐reported sleep journal. Methods Data were obtained from the second (2014–2017; n = 2724; 53.3% women; 62.0 ± 10.0 years) and third (2018–2021; n = 2087; 53.5% women; 65.1 ± 9.6 years) follow‐ups of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study. Seven‐day accelerometry data were analysed using GGIR (R‐based) and MACRO (Excel‐based) algorithms. A subset of participants also completed an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) sleep diary. Sleep onset (

Fields of Study & Subjects

Sleep and related disorders EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Publication details

Journal / source
Sleep research.
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
11–22
Publication date
9 January 2026
Language
EN