Assessing the Impact of Wastewater Flow Rates on SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA Detection: Insights for Environmental Surveillance and Policymaking

Read full text
Authors: Andre Felipe Bendix, Alex Batista Trentin, Deborah Catharine de Assis Leite, Betty Cristiane Kuhn, Felipe Beijamini, Simone N. Wendt, Flávia Regina Oliveira de Barros, Naiana Cristine Gabiatti, Juliana Morini Küpper Cardoso, Nédia de Castilhos Ghisi
Cited by: 1
References: 38

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wastewater‐based epidemiology (WBE) has been widely applied for SARS‐CoV‐2 surveillance. Yet, operational parameters such as influent flow rate and sewer system characteristics may reflect underlying hydraulic variability relevant to detection performance, raising questions about the representativeness of results from small and medium‐sized plants. We conducted a systematic meta‐analysis of 10 published studies assessing SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA detection across wastewater treatment plants of different sizes and flow ranges. Data were extracted into 2 × 2 tables and analyzed in R using the meta and metafor packages. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled with Mantel–Haenszel random‐effects models and DerSimonian–Laird τ 2 estimation. Subgroup analyses compared studies from developed versus emerging economies, meta‐regression tested population size as a moderator, and publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots and Egger's test. The overall pooled OR was 2.08 (95% CI: 0.99–4.37, p = 0.053; I 2 = 82.3%), indicating a non‐significant trend toward higher detection at higher flow rates. Subgroup analyses showed similar pooled effects across developed and emerging economies, though heterogeneity was lower in emerging settings. Meta‐regression revealed no significant association between population size and detection (slope = 0.29, p = 0.52). Funnel plots were relatively symmetric, and Egger's test did not indicate significant publication bias ( p = 0.169). Overall, these findings suggest that influent flow rate is not significantly associated with the probability of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection in WBE studies, supporting the inclusion of small and medium‐sized treatment plants in surveillance networks. At the same time, the concentration of studies in high‐income countries highlights inequities in the global WBE literature and in site deployment, with vulnerable populations often underrepresented. Expanding WBE infrastructure in underserved regions is necessary to ensure equitable and representative surveillance capacity.

Fields of Study & Subjects

SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing Fecal contamination and water quality Infection Control and Ventilation

Publication details

Journal / source
Environmental Quality Management
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
35
Issue
4
Publication date
27 March 2026
Language
EN