Erster deutscher Expertenkonsens zu Telemedizin in der Urologie

Read full text
Authors: Severin Rodler, Julian Risch, Marie-Luise Weiß, Sami‐Ramzi Leyh‐Bannurah, Moritz von Bueren, Fabian P. Siegel, Andreas Meißner, Alexander Piotrowski, Maximilian Bauser, Dirk M. Potempa, Mattis Franke, Andreas W. Schneider
+8 more Edwin Hermann, Johannes von Büren, Jakob Kohler, Philipp Nuhn, Christian Wülfing, Ulrich Witzsch, Julian Peter Struck, Hendrik Borgmann
Cited by: 0
References: 14

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is widely used in urology, but it has so far been insufficiently considered in clinical guidelines. METHODS: A two-stage expert consensus was conducted in which urology experts evaluated statements in two rounds. Between rounds, discussions took place either virtually or in person. Statements with 75% agreement in the final round were considered to be accepted. RESULTS: Fifteen experts participated in the first round of voting, achieving consensus on 20 out of 21 statements. After renewed discussion, 11 experts accepted 22 out of 23 statements. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine opens up new models of care in urology. Successful implementation requires adjustments in reimbursement and the training of all healthcare professionals.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation Healthcare Systems and Technology Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Publication details

Journal / source
Die Urologie
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
639–646
Publication date
6 March 2026
Language
DE