Omega and Reverse Omega Incisions: Techniques for Immediate or Delayed Reconstruction of Mildly Ptotic and Larger Breasts Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Read full text
Authors: Ilias Petrou, Dimitra Limnatitou, Andreas Vassiliou
Cited by: 1
References: 24

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast-Conserving Therapy (BCT) has become a widely accepted treatment option for selected breast cancer cases. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is considered an effective and oncologically safe approach for certain patients, as it preserves the native skin and nipple, allowing for one- or two-stage reconstruction with optimal cosmetic outcomes. This study aimed to provide our department's experience utilising the Omega and Reverse Omega incision techniques for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction for patients who had undergone NSM. METHOD: Our study included sixteen cancer patients with mildly ptotic and large breasts who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using prosthetic implants following NSM, where the Omega incision was utilised, either bilaterally or unilaterally, from January 2022 to December 2024, at the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Nicosia General Hospital. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, pre- and postoperative breast anthropometric measurements, and surgical complications were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: , and 25% were smokers. The mean follow-up was 11.62 months. From the patients who had undergone NSM, 12 (75%) were in the immediate reconstruction group, while the other 4 (25%) belonged to the delayed reconstruction group. Unilateral breast reconstruction was performed in 11 (52.38%) breasts. Bilateral NSM and immediate reconstruction with pre-pectoral implants was performed in 10 (47.61%) breasts. The Reverse Omega technique was performed in seven breasts. Single-stage breast reconstruction was performed for 17 (80.95%) breasts, while two-stage reconstruction for 4 (19.05%). Complications were reported, including a case of haematoma 1 (4.76%) and three cases of implant loss (14.28%). CONCLUSION: The Omega incision appears to be a safe and effective technique for immediate or delayed reconstruction for selected cases of NSM eligible cancer patients with slightly ptotic and/or larger breasts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention, such as case studies. Dramatic results in uncontrolled trials might also be regarded as this type of evidence.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Breast Implant and Reconstruction Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
3222–3234
Publication date
26 January 2026
Language
EN