Compression and Superficial Varicosities Outperform Gonadal Vein Diameter in Differentiating Symptomatic from Asymptomatic Pelvic Venous Disorders: A Case–Control Study

Read full text
Authors: BA Estefania Gonzales, Victoria Nguyen, Victoria Risner, Lourens du Pisanie, Nicole Keefe, Priya Mody, Marueen P. Kohi, Gloria Salazar
Cited by: 3
References: 25

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether gonadal vein (GV) diameter associates with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD)-consistent symptoms in women with pelvic varices, compared with proximal venous outflow obstruction (VOO; iliac/left renal vein stenosis/obstruction) and superficial varicosities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study identified patients with abdominopelvic imaging (2013-2024) showing parauterine/pelvic varices > 5 mm and documentation within ± 12 months for symptom adjudication. GV diameter was measured on venous-phase computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging by two readers, or from ultrasound when unavailable. Proximal VOO was ascertained by highest-confidence available testing and evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 200 patients (mean age, 52.4 ± 17.0 years), 84 (42.0%) were symptomatic and 116 (58.0%) asymptomatic. Mean GV diameter did not differ by symptom status (8.89 ± 2.29 vs 9.43 ± 2.50 mm; P = 0.121) and was not associated with symptoms in crude (odds ratio [OR], 0.91 per mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.03) or adjusted analysis (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.97 per-mm; 95% CI, 0.81-1.14). Proximal VOO was assessable in 189 patients and more common in symptomatic vs asymptomatic patients (32.9% vs 2.6%; P < 0.001), as were lower-extremity (LE) varices (44.0% vs 12.9%; P < 0.001) and superficial pelvic varicosities (28.6% vs 1.7%; all P < 0.001). In the adjusted model, younger age (aOR, 0.50 per 10 years; 95% CI, 0.39-0.65), LE varices (aOR, 9.80; 95% CI, 3.76-25.50), and any proximal VOO (aOR, 10.89; 95% CI, 2.66-44.55) were independently associated with symptomatic status. Discrimination was acceptable (c-statistic, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89) and unchanged by GV diameter. CONCLUSION: Among women with pelvic varices, GV diameter was not associated with PeVD-consistent symptoms and added no incremental predictive value beyond age, LE varices, and VOO. Comorbid venous disease and outflow obstruction may better distinguish clinically significant PeVD than diameter thresholds alone.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases Vascular anomalies and interventions Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Publication details

Journal / source
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
1268–1277
Publication date
7 June 2026
Language
EN