Addressing complex social-hydrogeological challenges through inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge co-production

Read full text
Authors: Linda Söller, Dženeta Hodžić, David Kuhn, Anne Jäger, Fanny Frick-Trzebitzky, Robert Luetkemeier, Petra Döll
Cited by: 0
References: 91

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge co-production (KCP) between science and practice is essential to address complex social-hydrogeological challenges. However, there is a need to clarify and operationalize KCP within collaborative research. This study characterizes KCP and evaluates its impact on developing sustainable groundwater management strategies based on two case studies in Europe, where transdisciplinary research enabled scientists and stakeholders to collaboratively develop sustainable groundwater management strategies. Utilizing workshop evaluations, ethnographic field notes, an interdisciplinary interview, and reflection meetings, the study identifies when, where, and how KCP occured within the transdisciplinary processes. Moreover, the study evaluates the value of interdisciplinary collaboration between natural and reflexive sciences to enhance groundwater management. The results reveal that KCP can be characterized by specific instances where diverse knowledge converged, occurring at interdisciplinary (within science), intersectoral (among stakeholders), and transdisciplinary (between science and stakeholders) levels. The study found that interdisciplinary KCP enhanced comprehensive system knowledge among scientists, while transdisciplinary KCP established a normative foundation for sustainable groundwater management. Intersectoral KCP improved collaboration efficiency among stakeholders. The collaboration between natural and reflexive science supported a critical examination of methods, objectives, and approaches employed, fostering a deeper understanding of site-specific groundwater-related challenges and enabling the development of tailored management actions. Evaluation of the collaborative research processes deepened the understanding and impacts of KCP, informing future research design for sustainability problem-solving. However, facilitating and evaluating KCP requires sufficient resources. The presented design of a transdisciplinary process, including KCP instances and evaluation principles, can guide other case studies to enable, evaluate, and sustain KCP.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration Environmental Science and Water Management Water Resource Management and Quality

Publication details

Journal / source
Hydrogeology Journal
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1655–1678
Publication date
17 January 2026
Language
EN