Deep brain stimulation for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review of target-specific outcomes and stereotactic technical considerations

Read full text
Authors: Alivery Raihanada Armando, Achmad Fahmi, Heri Subianto, Agus Turchan, Wei Wang, Youheng Peng, Muhammad Fadhil Kamaruddin, Ramidha Syaharani, Ramadhani Rizki Zamzam, Nathania Maulina
Cited by: 1
References: 45

Abstract

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects approximately 20-30% of patients, and a substantial proportion develop clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential neurosurgical intervention targeting dysfunctional cortico-striato-limbic circuitry. However, technical heterogeneity and limited clinical data constrain interpretation of outcomes. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251080715). Seven electronic databases were searched from inception through January 31, 2025. Clinical studies investigating DBS in TRS or CRS were included. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Data extraction emphasized stereotactic targeting methods, hardware configurations, stimulation parameters, and clinical outcomes. The total number of study is 6. We excluded paper by Manssuer 2023. The total study population comprises 21 patients. Seven studies involving 21 patients met inclusion criteria. Targets included the nucleus accumbens (NAcc; n = 11), substantia nigra (SNr; n = 1), habenula (HB; n = 2), subgenual cingulate (SCG; n = 4), subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC; n = 3). Reported PANSS total score changes ranged widely (11%-85.7%), reflecting substantial inter-individual variability and methodological limitations. Surgical complications occurred in 3 of 21 patients (14.2%), including infection and hemorrhage. All cases utilized open-loop stimulation and conventional cylindrical leads. Current evidence suggests a preliminary therapeutic signal for DBS in highly selected CRS patients, particularly with NAcc targeting. However, conclusions remain limited by small sample sizes, technical heterogeneity, and absence of controlled trials. Future investigations should prioritize standardized stereotactic reporting, volumetric lead reconstruction, and long-term safety assessment within specialized neurosurgical research settings. PROSPERO CRD420251080715.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Neurological disorders and treatments Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Neurosurgical Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
49
Issue
1
Publication date
2 May 2026
Language
EN