Physiotherapist and nurse perspectives on the acceptability and timing of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: Balancing standardisation and flexibility
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), when used at the point-of-care, provide a mechanism to systematically integrate patients' voices into shared decision-making. We examined clinicians' perspectives on the acceptability and preferred timing of PROM completion in routine clinical care for respiratory, musculoskeletal, cardiac, kidney and diabetic condition management. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted over videoconference between October 2024 and May 2025. Participants worked at various New South Wales Health clinics, providing care for patients with chronic conditions, and were eligible to collect and review PROMs digitally using the Health Outcomes Patient Experience platform (NSW PRMs-HOPE program). Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-two physiotherapists and nurses were interviewed. Acceptability themes included: (1) purpose of PROMs; (2) broader ethical considerations for PROMs collection and use; (3) practical aspects of PROM administration. Findings highlighted the elusiveness of an "ideal" timing for PROMs. Timing themes included: (1) (mis)alignment in timing of PROM administration; (2) preferences for fixed or customised timing and frequency of administration; (3) temporal fit and workflow alignment. CONCLUSION: PROMs were reported as most acceptable when their selection, content, and timing aligned with clinical purpose, scope of practice, and existing workflows. Flexibility in PROM administration was perceived to enhance relevance at the point-of-care and support timely, condition-specific clinical conversations and interventions. However, clinicians also recognised that increased flexibility may reduce the comparability of aggregated PROM data across cohorts, highlighting an inherent acceptability trade-off between meeting individual clinical needs and supporting system-level performance monitoring and benchmarking.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Cancer survivorship and care
Delphi Technique in Research
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Quality of Life Research
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Publication date
- 6 June 2026
- Language
- EN