The Upright Position of the Human Body: An Innocent Metaphorical Tool or a Yardstick of Dignity?

Read full text
Authors: Pauli Rautiainen, Maija Aalto-Heinilä, Karoliina Ahonen
Cited by: 1
References: 28

Abstract

Abstract This article explores how upright posture functions as a cultural norm deeply embedded in language, values, and institutions. Drawing on George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory, we show how verticality schemas shape thought and discourse by associating “up” with dignity, autonomy, and competence, while “down” signals weakness and inferiority. These metaphorical structures influence on institutions like architecture, rehabilitation practices, and social security systems, privileging standing bodies and marginalizing wheelchair users. To examine the lived impact of this norm, we analyze qualitative interview data from fifteen Finnish wheelchair users. Their experiences reveal how being below eye level signifies inequality and how rehabilitation often enforces uprightness. The wheelchair emerges as a cultural symbol of deviation, reinforcing ableist hierarchies. This article argues that human dignity should not depend on upright posture. We call for action that respects bodily diversity and challenges the cultural privilege of standing.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Disability Rights and Representation Spinal Cord Injury Research Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication date
2 February 2026
Language
EN