Assessing validity and reliability of the Positive Health and Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter questionnaires for measuring self-reported changes in Positive Health

Read full text
Authors: Vera P. van Druten, Babette C van der Zwaard, Margot J. Metz, Dike van de Mheen, Esther de Vries, Lenny M. W. Nahar-van Venrooij
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

Abstract Positive Health is gaining attention for measurement purposes. In this study, the 17-items Positive Health (PH17) questionnaire and the 12-items Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC12) questionnaire were investigated on usefulness for measuring self-reported changes in Positive Health. An observational study was performed in a Dutch post-covid-19 patient population to assess test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change (SDC)), internal consistency and construct validity by hypothesis testing. PH17, I.ROC12 and – for comparison – EQ5D-VAS were completed at six (T6) and twelve (T12) months after hospital discharge and again within 5 days after T12 (retest). For PH17, test-retest reliability was good for five factors and the total score (ICC >0.7, SEM 0.9 and too low for the factor Future perspective (0.9, SEM

Fields of Study & Subjects

Health psychology and well-being Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Resilience and Mental Health

Publication details

Journal / source
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
413–435
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN