Death technologies and digital afterlife: An ethical perspective

Read full text
Authors: Erik Hermann, Russell W. Belk, Vitor Lima
Cited by: 1
References: 129

Abstract

Abstract Technological advances are beginning to change the timeline and finality of death, and these emerging death technologies affect the dying, survivors, and society in unprecedented ways. We systematize current, emerging, and imagined technologically mediated or enabled human-death relationships through our REAL framework, which considers three areas of death technologies: digital R emembrance, life E xtension, and digital A fter L ife. These technologies extend consumption beyond the consumer life cycle into a consumer death cycle, raising profound ethical and marketing questions. Based on a thematic synthesis of recurring ethical principles, we conceptualize the CARE principles— C ontrol, A ccountability, R espect, and E quity—and illustrate implications for the (future) deceased, the bereaved, providers, and policymakers. Our work offers a starting point for understanding the complex ethical and marketing challenges of death technologies and the digital afterlife by developing a conceptual and ethical framework that clarifies how these technologies are organized, embedded, and governed within market systems. We also extend foundational concepts of consumer vulnerability, co-creation, and extended self into posthumous contexts, and lays out a research agenda.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Grief Bereavement and Mental Health Organ Donation and Transplantation Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Publication details

Journal / source
AMS Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
16
Issue
1
Publication date
1 May 2026
Language
EN