Qualification and explanation in the dynamical/geometrical debate
Abstract
Abstract We consider the distinction between ‘qualified’ and ‘unqualified’ approaches introduced by Read (2020a) in the context of the dynamical/geometrical debate. We show that one fruitful way in which to understand this distinction is in terms of what one takes the kinematically possible models of a given theory to represent; moreover, we show that the qualified/unqualified distinction is applicable not only to the geometrical approach (which is the case considered by Read (2020a)), but also to the dynamical approach. Finally, having made these points, we connect them to other discussions of representation and of explanation in this corner of the literature.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Philosophy and History of Science
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Publication details
- Journal / source
- European Journal for Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Publication date
- 15 January 2026
- Language
- EN