Bridging Divides and Building Resilience: a reply to Bridging the Divide: Using LLMs to Reshape Difficult Disagreements
Abstract
This Comment responds to Bridging the Divide: Using LLMs to Reshape Difficult Disagreements by Willis et al ( Philosophy and Theory of AI , 2026). We consider the proposal valuable as part of a toolkit for addressing epistemic bubbles. However we raise three challenges to be considered: the challenge of persuading individuals to engage with the preparatory environment; the uncertain transfer from private rehearsal to real-world discourse; and the fear of professional and social consequences that may still constrain real-world disagreement. We argue that such techniques should be situated within a more systemic focus on epistemic resilience, and suggest interventions at the levels of information provenance, collective sense-making, and institutions that protect legitimate contestation.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Artificial Intelligence Applications
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Philosophy & Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Publication date
- 23 April 2026
- Language
- EN