From Genomic Testing to Olaparib Treatment: Real-World Utilization and Outcomes in BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Read full text
Authors: Dianne van den Bosch, Kim J. M. van der Velden, Aart Beeker, Hendrik P. van den Berg, André M. Bergman, Maarten J. van der Doelen, Alfonsus JM. van den Eertwegh, Mathijs P. Hendriks, Thomas M. A. Kerkhofs, Addy C.M. van de Luijtgaarden, Niven Mehra, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar
+7 more Metin Tascilar, Walter L. Vervenne, Nir I. Weijl, Carin A. Uyl‐de Groot, Peter F.A. Mulders, Malou C. P. Kuppen, Inge M. van Oort
Cited by: 1
References: 25

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In November 2020, olaparib became the first approved poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm) in the Netherlands. As randomized clinical trials include fitter patients, their findings may not fully reflect real-world outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate genomic testing practice and subsequent use and outcomes of olaparib monotherapy in a real-world BRCAm mCRPC population. METHODS: Data were derived from ten hospitals in the Dutch CAPRI-3 registry, including mCRPC patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2021. Those receiving olaparib in standard-of-care treatment after its national approval (from November 2020) were analyzed and grouped as taxane-naïve (TN) or post-taxane (PT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 1996 mCRPC patients, genomic analysis (somatic and/or germline) was performed in 23.4% (range 3.8-63.2% across hospitals), identifying BRCAm in 11.3% of patients. Tested patients differed significantly in age, comorbidities, and prior treatment. Among 35 eligible BRCAm patients, 27 (77.1%) received olaparib. TN patients (8/27) were significantly older and initiated olaparib at an earlier line of therapy. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI) not reached) in TN versus 10.5 months (95% CI 9.6-11.5) in PT patients (p = 0.003). Limitations include the retrospective design and small subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic testing application remained limited and uneven across centers. Most eligible patients received olaparib; TN patients seemed to benefit most.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research PARP inhibition in cancer therapy Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Publication details

Journal / source
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
183–192
Publication date
9 May 2026
Language
EN