Digital Literacy, Digital Readiness and Acceptability of Digital Mental Health Among Mental Health Professionals: Findings from the Italian DIGIT-PSY Study

Read full text
Authors: Laura Orsolini, Giulio Longo, Luciano Mario, Gaia Sampogna, Andrea Amerio, Anna-Rita Atti, Stefano Barlati, Giuseppe Blasi, Paola Calò, Claudia Carmassi, Giuseppe Carrà, Giovanni Castellini
+17 more Armando D’Agostino, Pasquale De Fazio, Chiara De Panfilis, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Matteo Di Vincenzo, Carla Maria Gramaglia, Valeria Latorre, Mirko Manchia, Giovanni Martinotti, Mauro Pettorruso, Federica Pinna, Gabriele Sani, Gianluca Serafini, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Sarah Tosato, Antonio Ventriglio, Umberto Volpe
Cited by: 0
References: 41

Abstract

Abstract Beyond specific training in Digital Mental Health (DMH)/Digital Psychiatry (DP), mental health professionals (MHp) should own basic digital abilities and competences and a general openness to integrating technology into both clinical practice and daily life. These digital drivers have not been adequately investigated among MHp in Italy. As part of the DIGIT-PSY project, a multicenter observational study was conducted using the EUSurvey® platform. From May to September 2023, a cohort of multiprofessional MHp from 27 Italian university centers was surveyed to assess digital literacy (DHL), readiness (TR) and acceptability (ATiPP). The main aim was identifying whether these digitally-derived variables could influence the level of digitalization proneness in MH care. Overall, 60% of our sample was technologically ready, with a moderate-high level of basic DHL. Two TR factors are mainly represented among Italian MHp: optimism and discomfort. Multivariate linear regression revealed that higher ATIPP ( p < 0.001), higher DHL ( p < 0.001), higher perceived feasibility in digital implementation ( p < 0.001) and higher levels of social influence (p = 0.006) were positive drivers in digitalization by increasing TR [(F(12,1354) = 38.743; R 2 = 0.256; p < 0.001]. Conversely, a lower satisfaction derived by previous DMH/DP experiences was the most significant negative factor ( p = 0.037). Interestingly, Italian MHp overly displayed a higher optimistic view, despite higher discomfort perceptions from technology and digital innovation. However, Italian infrastructures and services and the lack of national regulatory guidelines in DMH/DP, together with an overly low level of education and training since University courses, may inhibit the digitalization process. Targeted interventions should consider national and university-based initiatives to overcome this gap.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Digital Mental Health Interventions Digital literacy in education Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Publication date
4 March 2026
Language
EN