Who counts as ‘us’? Latent profiles of moral inclusiveness, trauma history, and psychological wellbeing

Moral inclusiveness-the scope of one's moral circle-has traditionally been studied as a single, global trait. This study instead applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to uncover nuanced moral inclusiveness profiles spanning nested layers of relational proximity (family, community, global citizen, and nonhuman living beings). The study looked across four validated scales-Kindness, Compassion, Global-Mindedness, and Speciesism-and further examined how these profiles relate to trauma, mental health, and spirituality. A cross-sectional sample of 763 U.S. participants completed measures assessing moral inclusiveness, mental health, lifetime and recent traumatic events, and three spiritual dimensions: general spirituality, spiritual decline, and awakened awareness. LPA revealed five distinct profiles: Ingroup Concern, Outgroup Concern, Average Overall Concern, Universal Empathy, and Lovers. The Ingroup Concern class exhibited the highest levels of psychopathology, the most recent traumatic events, and elevated spiritual decline. The Universal Empathy and Lovers classes reported low current distress, minimal spiritual decline, and significantly higher awakened awareness, suggesting they experienced adversity yet still maintained meaning and/or guidance. Lifetime trauma exposure alone did not preclude a broad moral scope of inclusion: the Ingroup Concern and Universal Empathy classes both reported substantial trauma histories but diverged in moral inclusiveness, possibly due to differences in spiritual injury and ongoing stress. These findings reveal that a more parochial or limited moral scope is associated with lifetime and recent adversity, current mental health challenges, and spiritual injury. More expansive concern for human and fellow living beings is associated with positive spiritual engagement and fewer immediate negative life events.