The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics study: Design and analytic framework for assessing the impact of genome-informed risk assessments

Read full text
Authors: Nita Limdi, T. Mark Beasley, Josh Cortopassi, B. Davis, Hana Bangash, Jingheng Chen, Rex L. Chisholm, Wendy K. Chung, James J. Cimino, J. D. R. Connolly, David R. Crosslin, Kyle Davis
+63 more Alanna DiVietro, Edward D. Esplin, Bob Freimuth, A. Gordon, Hakon Hakonarson, Marwan Hamed, Megan He, Christin Hoell, Ingrid Holm, George Hripscak, M. Ryan Irvin, GP Jarvik, Dean Karavite, Elizabeth W. Karlson, Eimear E. Kenny, Atlas Khan, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Sarah Knerr, Bruce R. Korf, Leah Kottyan, Iftikhar Kullo, Katie Larkin, Niall J. Lennon, Jodell E. Linder, Teri A. Manolio, Lisa Martin, Elizabeth M. McNally, Jennifer Morse, S. Murphy, Bahram Namjou, Jacqueline A. Odgis, Lori Orlando, Jennifer Pacheco, Josh F. Peterson, Daniel E. Pineda-Alvarez, Cindy Prows, Megan J Puckelwartz, Jasmine Purcell, Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik, Heidi Rehm, Dan M. Roden, Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Robb Rowley, Maya Sabatello, DJ Schaid, Richard R. Sharp, Johanna L. Smith, Jordan W. Smoller, Emily R. Soper, Rene Sterling, Sabrina A. Suckiel, Shannon Terek, Jeritt G. Thayer, Yi-Lee Ting, Hemant Tiwari, Digna Velez-Edwards, Kavishwar B. Wagholikar, Theresa L. Walunas, W. Q. Wei, Chunua Weng, Georgia L. Wiesner, Noura S. Abul-Husn, DL Veenstra
Cited by: 6
References: 40

Abstract

The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network developed and implemented a genome-informed risk assessment (GIRA) to communicate genomic (polygenic risk scores [PRSs], integrated risk scores [IRSs], and monogenic results), clinical, and family history-based risk for 11 chronic diseases and provide recommended healthcare recommendations. GIRA reports have now been returned to 23,840 participants and their providers in a large prospective cohort study. We present here the study design and analysis framework for assessing the attributable impact of GIRA return. Pre-specified outcomes include (1) provider/participant adoption of recommended healthcare actions, (2) new diagnosis of disease, (3) treatment initiation/intensification, and (4) clinical outcomes (surrogate markers or clinical events). We assess outcomes in high risk vs. not-high-risk participants, adjusting for covariates. We evaluate the effect of PRS/IRS at pre-established high-risk thresholds using regression discontinuity (RD), a quasi-experimental method that mimics randomization near a cutoff, enabling estimation of causal effects and controlling for unobserved confounders. Monogenic and family history-based risk stratification are analyzed using logistic regression. With 23,840 participants and 12 months of follow-up, the study is powered to detect differences of 2%-11% with 80% power (α = 0.05 in the adoption outcome). Longer follow-up will be required to enable assessment of new disease diagnosis, treatment changes, and clinical outcomes. Through innovative RD analyses and defined outcomes and comparison groups, this study will provide new insights into the real-world clinical impact of genomic risk assessment, address critical evidence gaps, advance understanding of genomic medicine outcomes, and inform future research.

Fields of Study & Subjects

BRCA gene mutations in cancer Genomics and Rare Diseases Genetic Associations and Epidemiology

Publication details

Journal / source
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
664–677
Publication date
23 March 2026
Language
EN