Comparison of enteric methane emissions between the respiration chamber and the carbon dioxide method in Holstein heifer

Read full text
Authors: Jaesung Lee, Tasmina Akter, Rajaraman Bharanidharan, Sang Yeob Kim, Kamburawala Kankanamge Tharindu Namal Ranaweera, Junseok Oh, Seyun Im, Jinwoo Jeong, Junsung Kyung, Kyoung Hoon Kim, Myunggi Baik
Cited by: 0
References: 30

Abstract

The CO 2 method (CO 2 T) for measuring enteric CH 4 emissions was validated using emissions data derived from respiration chambers (RC). The study was conducted over a period of 108 d using ten Holstein heifers with a mean initial body weight (BW) of 178 ± 24 kg and average age of 7 ± 0.7 months. There were three consecutive experimental periods, each consisting of 21 d of premeasurement feeding, followed by two 3-d periods of CH 4 measurement sessions with the CO 2 T and the RC, respectively, for each animal. The diet consisted of 55% timothy hay and 45% concentrate, and was supplied twice daily at 1.2% to 1.5% BW on an as-fed basis. The CO 2 T measurements were conducted at morning and afternoon feeding. There were no significant differences in dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.155), CH 4 production (L/d and L/kg BW 0.75 ; P = 0.492 and 0.625, respectively), and CH 4 yield (L/kg DMI; P = 0.275) between the two methods. Results obtained using the RC and the CO 2 T were strongly correlated for both CH 4 production (L/d; r = 0.67, P = 0.042) and CH 4 yield (L/kg DMI; r = 0.61, P = 0.062). Linear regression analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between the two methods for CH 4 production ( R 2 = 0.52; P = 0.019) and CH 4 yield ( R 2 = 0.43; P = 0.039). In conclusion, the CO 2 T and the RC produce comparable results, with acceptable accuracy and precision.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Odor and Emission Control Technologies Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

Publication details

Journal / source
Animal nutrition
Volume
25
Pages
30–36
Publication date
3 January 2026
Language
EN