Design and context of use of postpartum haemorrhage kits in the UK: a qualitative study combining human factors and social science analysis

Read full text
Authors: Matthew Woodward, Alison E. Powell, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Jenni Burt, Cathy Winter, Katherine Lattey, Tim J Draycott, PPH Kits Contributor Group, Jan W. van der Scheer
Cited by: 0
References: 39

Abstract

Abstract Effective management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) – a leading cause of maternal mortality – depends on rapid access to critical equipment and medications. PPH emergency kits support timely care, but their design and practical use remain largely unexamined. We combined human factors and social science analysis – drawing on photographs, field observations, and 19 interviews with maternity professionals – to examine kit designs, usability, and contextual factors in six UK maternity units. Many design features, including kit format, item grouping, item visibility, and portability, varied substantially across units. Usability was shaped by factors including labour room and storage constraints, medication access, staff skill mix, and restocking procedures. Some designs risked delays or confusion in emergencies. While standardisation may improve kit safety and efficiency, rigid solutions may risk misalignment with local workflows. A modular approach combining standardised core components with adaptable elements, co-designed with end-users and grounded in ergonomic principles may provide an effective solution. Highlights Emergency kits support timely management of life-threatening postpartum haemorrhage. We used human factors and social science to examine kit design and context of use. Kit format, configuration, and portability varied across six maternity units. Kit design was highly variable, with implications for usability and risk. Modular kits may improve safety by combining standardised and adaptable features.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Maternal and fetal healthcare Usability and User Interface Design Patient Safety and Medication Errors

Publication details

Journal / source
Applied Ergonomics
Volume
135
Pages
104763–104763
Publication date
6 March 2026
Language
EN