An app-based nonpharmacological intervention improves patient-reported disease activity, functionality, and quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a randomised controlled trial

Read full text
Authors: Patrick‐Pascal Strunz, Matthias Froehlich, Tobias Heusinger, Maxime Le Maire, Anna Fleischer, Karsten Sebastian Luetkens, Patricia Possler, M. Gernert, Hannah Labinsky, Ottar Gadeholt, Robert Leppich, Astrid Schmieder
+4 more Ludwig Hammel, Billy Sperlich, Hermann Einsele, Marc Schmalzing
Cited by: 2
References: 33

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: No app-based nonpharmacological intervention has yet demonstrated to meaningfully improve disease activity, functional status, and disease-specific quality of life in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We evaluated Axia, a CE-marked smartphone application designed for axSpA, that combines personalised exercise therapy, patient education, and disease management, supported by gamification for long-term adherence. METHODS: To evaluate its clinical efficacy, a 12-week monocentric randomised controlled interventional trial was conducted involving 200 patients with axSpA with stable pharmacotherapy. Patients were randomised (1:1) to either using Axia (intervention group [IG]) or standard of care (control group [CG]). RESULTS: A total of 186 participants (mean age 50.61 years, 66% females, 56% with radiographic axSpA, mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] 5.17, and 58% received biologicals or Janus kinase inhibitors) completed the study (95 in the IG and 91 in the CG). Compared to CG, participants in the IG demonstrated significant improvements in BASDAI (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]-estimated group difference: -1.508, P < .001), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (-1.139; P < .001), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire (-2.297; P < .001), all exceeding minimal clinically important difference thresholds. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the IG achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 response compared to the CG (51% vs 9%; P < .001), and the ASAS40 response rate was also higher (23% vs 3%; P < .001). No concerning safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the potential of Axia as a safe and effective nonpharmacological intervention to further improve the state of care of patients with axSpA in addition to conventional anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Publication details

Journal / source
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
85
Issue
8
Pages
1543–1555
Publication date
13 March 2026
Language
EN