Clinical Outcomes of First-Time and Redo Mitral Valve Replacement Using MITRIS RESILIA Bioprosthesis

Read full text
Authors: Satoshi Kainuma, Tomoki Shimokawa, Tomohiro Iwakura, Haruki Mikoshiba, Atsushi Yano, Atsushi Kurushima, Tatsuo Motoki, Yoshiaki Fukumura, Kazuhisa Sakamoto, Yuki Wada, Nobuhisa Ohno, Tomoki Ushijima
+8 more Akira Shiose, Katsuhiro Omae, Manabu Minami, Haruko Yamamoto, Rieko Kutsuzawa, Shinya Tajima, Tomoyuki Fujita, Satsuki Fukushima
Cited by: 0
References: 5

Abstract

Background: The MITRIS RESILIA bioprosthetic valve incorporates anticalcification technology and is designed to facilitate implantation in fragile mitral annuli. However, clinical data on its safety and hemodynamic performance remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 140 patients (mean age, 75 ± 8 years; 44% male) who underwent first-time (n = 100) or redo (n = 40) mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a MITRIS RESILIA valve between 2021 and 2022. The primary indication for first-time MVR was mitral regurgitation, followed by mitral stenosis, whereas that for redo MVR was prosthetic valve dysfunction, followed by failed repair. The mean follow-up duration was 36 ± 14 months (415 patient-years). Results: < .001). Conclusions: First-time and redo MVR with the MITRIS RESILIA valve was associated with low perioperative mortality, favorable safety, and durable hemodynamic performance. These findings support its use across a broad spectrum of mitral valve diseases.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
618–624
Publication date
10 January 2026
Language
EN