Elevating blood pressure in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: Investigating the efficacy and tolerability of rebreathing therapy

Read full text
Authors: Jacquie R. Baker, Shaun I. Ranada, Anthony V. Incognito, Robert S. Sheldon, Carlos A. Morillo, Richard J.A. Wilson, Aaron Alexander Phillips, Satish R Raj
Cited by: 1
References: 20

Abstract

PURPOSE: ) alone. METHODS: In this exploratory sub-study, ten patients with nOH (F = 3; 69 ± 9 years) performed two sit-to-stand tests while breathing either room air or simulated rebreathing. Continuous blood pressure, heart rate, respiration, stroke volume, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance were recorded. Hemodynamics were averaged over the final minute of stand for each condition. Tolerability was defined as completing the full 5-minute stand without aborting due to breathing discomfort. RESULTS: Compared to room air, simulated rebreathing increased standing systolic blood pressure (p = 0.02), stroke volume (p = 0.03), cardiac output (p = 0.02), and reduced hypotensive time (p = 0.02). Hemodynamic responses and hypotensive time during simulated rebreathing did not differ from +CO₂ alone (all p > 0.1). Tolerability was lower with only 2/10 patients completing the simulated rebreathing protocol, primarily due to shortness of breath, whereas 9/10 completed +CO₂ alone (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Simulated rebreathing improves standing blood pressure in nOH but is poorly tolerated. High CO₂ alone appears equally effective and better tolerated. CO₂ delivery systems that elevate CO₂ while maintaining oxygen may offer a more feasible therapeutic strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL NO: NCT05295810 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05295810.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Autonomic Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
264
Pages
103400–103400
Publication date
20 February 2026
Language
EN