Experimental translocation of a rare Hawaiian tree reveals disparity between remnant and potential habitat

Translocation is implemented worldwide as a conservation strategy for rare and endangered plant species, yet the factors that influence long-term success remain poorly understood. Remnant wild populations are often used as indicators to model habitat preference and select translocation sites, but such populations may be refugia from past biological or anthropogenic stressors and represent sub-optimal habitat conditions for focal taxa. To test assumptions about habitat preferences of rare species, we conducted a four-year experimental translocation of the Critically Endangered Hawaiian tree, ‘ohe mauka, Polyscias bisattenuata (Araliaceae), planting 3,700 saplings across eleven sites spanning diverse environmental conditions both within and beyond the species’ extant range. We measured seventeen predictor variables at the site and individual plant level in categories of climate, surrounding vegetation, soil chemistry, and genetic provenance. We used linear mixed effects models to assess relative effects of predictors on translocated plant survival, growth, and vigor. The factors which influenced plant performance shifted across ontogeny. The height of surrounding vegetation showed an initial negative relationship with two-year survival, but later showed a positive relationship with four-year growth. Four-year growth demonstrated a strong positive relationship with site annual mean temperature. Successful translocation sites were lower in elevation and warmer in temperature than conditions represented by remnant wild populations. Results demonstrate that basing translocation sites solely on limited extant wild occurrences can lead to suboptimal restoration practices, and experimental outplanting across broad conditions may help identify rare species' contemporary habitat preferences.