Outcomes of immediate implant-based vs. autologous breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant therapy

Read full text
Authors: Ziyue Lin, Jian Yin
Cited by: 1
References: 36

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of modality for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains controversial. We compared the complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction between two IBR techniques, immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), in patients treated with NAT, with the goal of informing clinical practice. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent unilateral IBR after receiving NAT were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, tumour profiles, treatment regimens, complication data, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic scores were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were also conducted separately for each group. RESULTS: Of 172 patients who were included in the study, 97 underwent IBBR and 75 underwent ABR. Reconstruction failures (18.6% vs. 1.3%, p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Breast Implant and Reconstruction Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques Breast Cancer Treatment Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
114
Pages
135–143
Publication date
21 January 2026
Language
EN