Outcomes of immediate implant-based vs. autologous breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant therapy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The choice of modality for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains controversial. We compared the complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction between two IBR techniques, immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), in patients treated with NAT, with the goal of informing clinical practice. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent unilateral IBR after receiving NAT were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, tumour profiles, treatment regimens, complication data, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic scores were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were also conducted separately for each group. RESULTS: Of 172 patients who were included in the study, 97 underwent IBBR and 75 underwent ABR. Reconstruction failures (18.6% vs. 1.3%, p
Fields of Study & Subjects
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 135–143
- Publication date
- 21 January 2026
- Language
- EN