An independent validation of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy with radicular pain

Read full text
Authors: Francis Grondin, Chad Cook, Toby Hall, Olivier Maillard, Yannick Perdrix, S. Freppel
Cited by: 1
References: 28

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A clinical prediction rule (CPR) for cervical radiculopathy (CR), published in 2003, is widely used in practice and recommended in clinical practice guidelines. To date, this CPR has not been independently validated. OBJECTIVE: To perform an independent broad validation of the 2003 CPR using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference standard, and to investigate whether an alternative test cluster has stronger diagnostic utility for identifying CR with radicular pain. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted following the updated STARD 2015 guidelines. Eighty-five individuals (27 with CR) were included from 109 consecutive patients. The diagnosis of CR was based on cervical spine MRI findings consistent with the patient's clinical features, symptoms, and neurological examination, interpreted by a neurosurgeon. Twelve clinical tests were performed by the same examiner blinded to diagnosis. RESULTS: Validation of the 2003 CPR (cervical distraction, Spurling's test, upper limb neurodynamic test (ULNT) 1, and cervical rotation

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy Medical Imaging and Analysis Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Publication details

Journal / source
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
101581–101581
Publication date
1 May 2026
Language
EN