Interactive Pathways of Key Prognostic Factors in Severe Asthma

Read full text
Authors: Chandra Prakash Yadav, Laura Huey Mien Lim, David Price, Rupsa Roy, Juang Yah Ru, Richard Beasley, Christer Janson, Mariko Siyue Koh, Eileen Wang, Michael E. Wechsler, David J. Jackson, John Busby
+28 more Liam G. Heaney, Paul Pfeffer, Bassam Mahboub, Diahn-Warng Perng, Borja G. Cosio, Luis Perez-de-Llano, Riyad Omar Al-Lehebi, Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, Mona Al-Ahmad, Chin Kook Rhee, Takashi Iwanaga, Enrico Heffler, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Richard Costello, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Andriana I. Papaioannou, Celeste Michala Porsbjerg, Carlos A. Torres-Duque, George C. Christoff, Todor A. Popov, Mark J Hew, Matthew Peters, Peter G. Gibson, Jorge Maspero, Céline Bergeron, Saraid Cerda, Elvia Angelica Contreras, Wenjia Chen
Cited by: 1
References: 30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The way in which risk predictors combine and contribute to severe asthma exacerbations may differ between clinical trials and real-world settings. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do the interactive pathways of risk predictors leading to severe asthma exacerbations compare under clinical trials vs real-world settings? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis involved 345 patients with severe asthma from the placebo arms of 2 international randomized controlled trials (RCTs), compared with 6,814 biologic-naïve patients from the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR). Sixteen key risk predictors, including demographics, biomarkers, lung function, health care use, exacerbation history, long-term oral corticosteroid use, asthma control, and nasal polyps, were covered. The outcome was the occurrence of severe asthma exacerbations over the 365 days after study enrollment. Bayesian networks (BNs), obtained from machine learning combined with expert knowledge, elucidated significant interplay processes of risk predictors that led to severe asthma exacerbations. External validation was performed in each cohort. RESULTS: The RCTs revealed 44 significant arcs (ie, probabilistic interdependency) between 16 risk factors, whereas the ISAR showed 170. Despite this difference, the main downstream prediction pathways were consistent across both settings, with 2 key pathways: total serum IgE level influenced blood eosinophils to predict future severe exacerbations, and severe exacerbation history directly predicted future severe exacerbations. In external validation, RCT-BN generalized well to ISAR patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68), whereas ISAR-BN underperformed in RCT patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.50), and ISAR-BN demonstrated better calibration. INTERPRETATION: Our results show that the core pathways predicting severe asthma exacerbations were similar in both RCTs and real-world settings, with comparable predictive performance.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Machine Learning in Healthcare Asthma and respiratory diseases Health Environment Cognitive Aging

Publication details

Journal / source
CHEST Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
169
Issue
5
Pages
1183–1197
Publication date
24 January 2026
Language
EN