Need for harmonized terminology in cryopreservation to support reproducibility, regulation, and translation

Read full text
Authors: Lakshya Gangwar, Lowell Wolfe, Nikolas Zuchowicz, Irina Filz von Reiterdank, Srivasupradha Ramesh, Bat‐Erdene Namsrai, Joseph R. Kangas, Joseph Sushil Rao, Matthew J. Powell‐Palm, Timothy L. Pruett, John C. Bischof, Susan M. Wolf
+1 more Korkut Uygun
Cited by: 1
References: 74

Abstract

As cryopreservation technologies continue to develop, the need for harmonized terminology across the multitude of disciplines where cryopreservation is applied is becoming increasingly acute. Terminology in cryopreservation remains inconsistent, leading to confusion and barriers to progress. Applications of cryopreservation in medicine, food, agriculture, and conservation remain limited by this lack of consensus. Inconsistent terminology contributes to ethical, legal, and societal issues in translating and integrating new cryopreservation technologies. Here we identify the problem with examples of cryopreservation terminology that demand harmonization. We describe the need for terminological consistency by providing examples of effective terminology harmonization projects in related fields. We propose next steps, highlighting the important role that professional societies should play to reach consensus on terminology among cryopreservation stakeholders and the broader cryobiology community.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Reproductive Health and Technologies Reproductive Biology and Fertility Plant tissue culture and regeneration

Publication details

Journal / source
Cryobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
122
Pages
105584–105584
Publication date
13 February 2026
Language
EN