A randomized phase III clinical trial of weekly versus tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: results of the TACO (GCIG/KGOG 1027/THAI 2012) study

Read full text
Authors: S.Y. Ryu, Byung‐Ho Nam, M.H. Kim, W.I. Jang, Chomporn Sitathanee, T.D. Linh, K.H. Lee, W.M. Lee, E.T. Kim, S.B. Kang, J.H. Kim, J.Y. Park
+15 more K.B. Lee, C.H. Cho, H. Lou, Y.H. Kim, Y.T. Kim, Y.H. Lee, Xiaohua Wu, J.W. Kim, S.I. Park, S. Jeon, D.H. Thinh, S.F. Kry, David K. Gaffney, William C. Small, Sarikapan Wilailak
Cited by: 0
References: 17

Abstract

Background The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy; however, the optimal dose and dosing schedule of cisplatin remain debated. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m 2 versus those of tri-weekly cisplatin at 75 mg/m 2 during radiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients and methods In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 314 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer, randomly assigning them in a 1 : 1 ratio into two arms. The weekly arm received a weekly dose of 40 mg/m 2 cisplatin for six cycles, whereas the tri-weekly arm received a tri-weekly dose of 75 mg/m 2 cisplatin for three cycles, both concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoints included 3-year recurrence-free survival according to a superiority design, with P < 0.05 indicative of statistical significance. Overall survival, toxicity profiles, and quality of life (QOL) were also analyzed. Results Chemotherapy delay was more frequent in the weekly arm than in the tri-weekly arm ( P = 0.008). However, the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate between the two arms did not significantly differ (78.7% in the weekly arm, 84.1% in the tri-weekly arm; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.32, P = 0.28). The pattern of recurrence did not differ significantly between the two arms. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities occurred less frequently in the tri-weekly arm ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, the tri-weekly arm had better QOL scores across several domains compared with the weekly arm. Conclusion In this study, tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy was not statistically superior to a weekly schedule in terms of survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the tri-weekly regimen exhibited a more favorable toxicity profile and improved QOL compared with the weekly regimen. These results suggest tri-weekly cisplatin administration as a feasible alternative for chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments Cervical Cancer and HPV Research Head and Neck Cancer Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
ESMO Open
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
106102–106102
Publication date
10 March 2026
Language
EN