Sutureless Purely Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

Read full text
Authors: Aldo Brassetti, Gabriele Tuderti, Umberto Anceschi, Alfredo Maria Bove, Eugenio Bologna, Lorenzo Capecchi, Giuseppe Chiacchio, Simone D’Annunzio, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Rocco Simone Flammia, Salvatore Guaglianone, S. Iuculano
+9 more Claudia Denaro, Arianna Di Luzio, Costantino Leonardo, Leslie Claire Licari, Riccardo Mastroianni, Leonardo Misuraca, Flavia Proietti, Isabella Sperduti, Giuseppe Simone
Cited by: 6
References: 29

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The sutureless (SL) purely off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy (ocRPN) technique has been proposed to minimize postoperative functional damage. We assessed whether this approach is noninferior to renorrhaphy (RR) in terms of surgical quality. METHODS: Patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal tumors were randomly assigned to SL or RR-ocRPN within a single-center, single-surgeon randomized controlled trial (NCT06846112). A covariate-adaptive 1:1 randomization algorithm ensured balance between treatment arms for age, sex, baseline renal function, and tumor surgical complexity. The primary endpoint was Trifecta achievement at discharge. A prespecified noninferiority test (margin -10%) compared Trifecta rates using one-sided testing and confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes were descriptively analyzed and compared between study arms. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 248 patients, baseline characteristics were balanced. Trifecta was achieved in 93% and 95% of cases (absolute difference -2.4%; 90% confidence interval [CI] -7.4%-2.6%), meeting the criterion for noninferiority (one-sided p = 0.006). Blood transfusions (2.4% vs 0%) and acute kidney injury (1.6% in both groups) were rare. Nine urinary fistulae occurred overall, all managed with temporary stenting; rates were higher in the SL group but not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Renal function remained stable up to 12 mo, and 1-yr RFS was 99% in all cohorts. Limitations include single-center design, surgeon expertise, and short oncologic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SL-ocRPN is safe and effective and represents a feasible alternative to RR-ocRPN in selected cT1-2N0M0 renal tumors.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Renal cell carcinoma treatment Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
291–300
Publication date
15 May 2026
Language
EN