Integrated geological, economic, and risk assessment of underground hydrogen storage

Read full text
Authors: Prakash Purswani, K C Bijay, Hyeonseok Lee, Yun Yang, U. C. Iyare, Lawrence O. Baompong, Shaowen Mao, David Li, Zhidi Wu, Manjeet Chhetri, Siqin Yu, Xiaoyu Zhang
+22 more Ruyi Zheng, Chelsea W. Neil, Q. Kang, Wenfeng Li, Neala Creasy, Eric J. Guiltinan, Wen Zhao (302324), Mohamed Mehana, Luke Frash, Amber Zandanel, Jeffrey D. Hyman, Gaoxue Wang, Robert P. Currier, Daniel P. Leonard, Siddharth Komini Babu, Rose J. Adams, Isaac Daniel Mantelli, George Perkins, Marlena Rock, Stuart D. Ware, Timothy C. Germann, Michael R. Gross
Cited by: 4
References: 194

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) is a promising option to buffer variable renewable power and support the hydrogen economy. Yet this technology is early-stage, and key uncertainties remain about how coupled processes such as geochemical and geomechanical impacts affect long-term storage security. In this paper, we seek to integrate the results from a large, multi-scale research program to quantify core feasibility metrics and situate these studies within ongoing efforts. Through this work, we evaluate hydrogen recoverability during storage by assessing diffusive losses, losses to geochemical interactions and their subsequent impact on geomechanical properties, and losses to residual saturation during injection and withdrawal. Molecular and laboratory studies show that lithologic heterogeneity, pore geometry, and mineral surface chemistry govern hydrogen–rock interactions, controlling loss pathways. High-pressure coreflooding is used to estimate relative permeabilities and measure parameters needed for reservoir-scale sensitivity analyses. These core-scale experiments found early hydrogen breakthrough at low saturations driven by capillary and viscous fingering, which limits pore-space utilization at early times, while repeated injection and withdrawal cycles improve deliverability over time. Technoeconomic factors and purity requirements for end uses are also considered as part of our comprehensive feasibility analysis. Finally, we underscore the importance of geophysical monitoring and tailored injection strategies to maintain integrity and efficiency. Together, these results provide a quantitative foundation for safe, scalable deployment of UHS and highlight priorities for future integrated studies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions Underground infrastructure and sustainability Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications

Publication details

Journal / source
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
420
Pages
138930–138930
Publication date
4 March 2026
Language
EN